基于CFD方法的棒束通道内临界热流密度预测

doi:10.7538/yzk.2018.52.05.0782

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

为研究棒束通道内临界热流密度现象，采用基于对气、液两相分别建立基本守恒方程的欧拉两流体六方程模型和改进的壁面热流密度分配模型，利用CFD商用软件FLUENT 14.5对捷克大型水介质实验回路上开展的临界热流密度（CHF）实验进行数值模拟。通过计算获得CHF发生前、后计算域内重要热工水力参数的分布及CHF发生值，将CFD计算获得的CHF与实验测得值进行对比，结果表明，大多数工况的偏差在±30%以内，证明了欧拉两流体模型结合改进的壁面热流密度分配模型对CHF预测的准确性。本研究可为复杂结构的CHF预测提供依据。

关键词: 计算流体力学, 临界热流密度, 棒束通道

Abstract:

To evaluate the critical heat flux (CHF), the Eulerian two-fluid model coupled with improved RPI (Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute) wall boiling model was employed to investigate the CHF phenomena in rod bundles by using FLUENT 14.5 code. By comparison between the predicted CHF and measured one in large water loop experiment in Czech, it is found that most deviations are in the region of less than ±30%. The results prove that Eulerian two-fluid model coupled with improved RPI wall boiling model is qualified to predict CHF accurately. The work in the paper can provide reference for predicting CHF in complicated geometry by CFD methodology.

Key words: computational fluid dynamics, critical heat flux, rod bundle

张蕊;田文喜;秋穗正;苏光辉*. 基于CFD方法的棒束通道内临界热流密度预测[J]. 原子能科学技术, 2018, 52(5): 782-787.

ZHANG Rui;TIAN Wenxi;QIU Suizheng;SU Guanghui*. Prediction of Critical Heat Flux in Rod Bundle Based on CFD Methodology[J]. Atomic Energy Science and Technology, 2018, 52(5): 782-787.

参考文献

［1］MACEK J, VYSKOCIL L. Simulation of critical heat flux experiments in NEPTUNE_CFD code［C］∥XCFD4NRS: Experiments and CFD Code Applications to Nuclear Reactor Safety. France: OECD/NEA, 2008.
［2］ISHII M, ZUBER N. Drag coefficient and relative velocity in bubbly, droplet or particulate flows［J］. AIChE Journal, 1979, 25(5): 843-855.
［3］樊普,贾斗南,秋穗正. 低压下水欠热流动沸腾的两相CFD数值模拟研究［J］. 原子能科学技术,2011,45(4):412-420.PAN Pu, JIA Dounan, QIU Suizheng. CFD investigation of subcooled flow boiling model under low pressure［J］. Atomic Energy Science and Technology, 2011, 45（4）: 412-420（in Chinese）.
［4］SCHMIDTKE M. Investigation of the dynamics of fluid particles using the volume of fluid method［D］. Germany: University Paderborn, 2008.
［5］TOMIYAMA A, TAMAI H, ZUN I, et al. Transverse migration of single bubbles in simple shear flows［J］. Chemical Engineering Science, 2002, 57(11): 1849-1858.
［6］TOMIYAMA A. Struggle with computational bubble dynamics［J］. Multiphase Science and Technology, 1998, 10(4): 369-405.
［7］MORAGA F, BONETTO F, LAHEY R. Lateral forces on spheres in turbulent uniform shear flow［J］. International Journal of Multiphase Flow, 1999, 25(6): 1321-1372.
［8］ANTAL S, LAHEY J R, FLAHERTY J. Analysis of phase distribution in fully developed laminar bubbly two-phase flow［J］. International Journal of Multiphase Flow, 1991, 17(5): 635-652.
［9］de BERTODANO M L, LAHEY R, JONES O. Turbulent bubbly two-phase flow data in a triangular duct［J］. Nuclear Engineering and Design, 1994, 146(1): 43-52.
［10］BURNS A D, FRANK T, HAMILL I, et al. The Favre averaged drag model for turbulent dispersion in Eulerian multiphase flows［C］∥5th International Conference on Multiphase Flow. Japan: Yokohama Pacifico Conference Center, 2004.
［11］RANZ W, MARSHALL W. Evaporation from drops［J］. Chemical Engineering Progress, 1952, 48(3): 141-146.
［12］JUDD R, HWANG K. A comprehensive model for nucleate pool boiling heat transfer including microlayer evaporation［J］. Journal of Heat Transfer, 1976, 98(4): 623-629.
［13］LAVIEVILLE J, QUEMERAIS E, MIMOUNI S, et al. NEPTUNE CFD theory manual［M］. France: CEA/EDF, 2006.
［14］ÜNAL H. Maximum bubble diameter, maximum bubble-growth time and bubble-growth rate during the subcooled nucleate flow boiling of water up to 17.7 MN/m2［J］. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 1976, 19(6): 643-649.
［15］TOLUBINSKY V, KOSTANCHUK D. Vapour bubbles growth rate and heat transfer intensity at subcooled water boiling［J］. Heat Transfer, 1970, 23: 1-5.
［16］COLE R. A photographic study of pool boiling in the region of the critical heat flux［J］. AIChE Journal, 1960, 6(4): 533-538.
［17］LEMMERT M, CHAWLA J. Influence of flow velocity on surface boiling heat transfer coefficient［M］. New York: Academic Press and Hemisphere, 1977.

[1]	董玲玉, 周志锋, 戴潮虎, 赵珂, 吴宗芸, 刘天才, 赵民富, 杨文, 胡长军. 数值堆热工流体高精细并行模拟优化技术研究[J]. 原子能科学技术, 2021, 55(9): 1581-1593.
[2]	李兴, 王强龙, 邱金荣, 侯晓凡, 谭思超. 加/减速流动下棒束通道内速度分布和湍流特性研究[J]. 原子能科学技术, 2021, 55(9): 1692-1699.
[3]	祁沛垚, 李兴, 邓坚, 于晓勇, 谭思超. 脉动流条件下棒束通道阻力特性研究[J]. 原子能科学技术, 2021, 55(5): 840-848.
[4]	杜为安;张琦;杨继行;闫超星;张翼;刘成洋. 压力容器环形下降段内含硼溶液流动混合特性的数值模拟分析[J]. 原子能科学技术, 2021, 55(3): 432-439.
[5]	祁沛垚;郝思佳;苏建科;邱枫;谭思超. 脉动流下棒束通道内流场与湍流特性的PIV实验研究[J]. 原子能科学技术, 2021, 55(1): 142-150.
[6]	侯延栋;汪刘;张魁;王明军;巫英伟;田文喜;苏光辉;秋穗正. 六边形排列的7棒束通道内液态钠流动换热特性试验研究[J]. 原子能科学技术, 2020, 54(9): 1550-1558.
[7]	米争鹏;谭思超;邹思远;邱志方;朱大欢;张丹;邓坚;蔡容;吴菱艳. 棒束通道内温度场分布特性研究[J]. 原子能科学技术, 2020, 54(9): 1644-1651.
[8]	孙畅;焦守华;柴翔;杨云. 基于CFD方法的铅铋冷却燃料棒束的热工水力特性分析[J]. 原子能科学技术, 2020, 54(8): 1386-1394.
[9]	冯琳娜;李权;黄永忠;刘振海;齐飞鹏;M. Avramova. 基于流固共轭传热的两相流动数值模拟及燃料子通道CHF预测研究[J]. 原子能科学技术, 2020, 54(6): 1092-1098.
[10]	史昊鹏;廖炜铖;钟达文;孟继安;赵金鹏;雒晓涛. 朝下针翅结构表面稳态临界沸腾换热实验研究[J]. 原子能科学技术, 2020, 54(12): 2337-2343.
[11]	田道贵;胡啸;陈炼;常华健. 池沸腾下朝向SA508钢表面临界热流密度特性试验研究[J]. 原子能科学技术, 2020, 54(12): 2362-2368.
[12]	郝思佳;李兴;祁沛垚;乔守旭;谭思超;王啸宇. 5×5棒束通道内流动转捩特性研究[J]. 原子能科学技术, 2020, 54(12): 2376-2384.
[13]	杨红义;宋维. 基于FDS程序的钠火事故情景模拟技术研究[J]. 原子能科学技术, 2020, 54(11): 2113-2120.
[14]	黄辉;王时龙;马驰;周杰;董建鹏;周科源. 乏燃料剪切机气固两相流分析及结构优化[J]. 原子能科学技术, 2020, 54(10): 1969-1978.
[15]	李兴;祁沛垚;谭思超;郝思佳;米争鹏. 脉动流下棒束通道内相位差及瞬态流场研究[J]. 原子能科学技术, 2019, 53(8): 1402-1409.