氟盐冷却高温堆氚输运特性瞬态分析

doi:10.7538/yzk.2018.52.05.0795

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

氚是熔盐堆运行过程中的固有产物，具有强腐蚀性和渗透性，是限制熔盐堆技术发展的瓶颈问题之一。本文围绕氟盐冷却高温堆（FHR）中氚输运特性在事故工况下的瞬态响应开展研究，主要讨论在无保护反应性引入（URI）及无保护冷却剂入口过冷（UOC）事故下，熔盐堆一回路中的氚产率、石墨吸附量、熔盐溶解量、腐蚀与沉积反应以及氚向二回路的扩散等特性。研究发现，瞬态条件下氚输运特性较稳态时更为复杂多变，呈现出强烈的动态耦合特点，这对氚控设备的性能提出了更高的要求。计算表明，在URI和UOC事故下，氚向二回路的扩散速率均降低，不需投入额外的氚控安全设施。

关键词: 氟盐冷却高温堆, 氚, 输运特性, 瞬态工况

Abstract:

Tritium, as an inherent detrimental byproduct of molten salt reactor (MSR), featured with corrosivity and permeability, is one of the most critical problems confining the development of MSR. In this paper, tritium transport characteristics for fluoride-salt-cooled high-temperature reactor (FHR) were analyzed including tritium production rate, graphite absorption, and tritium dissolution in molten salt, corrosion and deposition reactions as well as T₂ diffusion, under transients such as unprotected reactivity insertion (URI) accident and unprotected overcooling (UOC) accident. It is found that tritium transport characteristics become much more complicated under transient conditions than steady state, and they are strongly coupled with each other, bringing higher requirements for the performances of the tritium control equipment. Furthermore, the rates of T₂diffusing to the secondary loop both decrease under URI accident and UOC accident, averting the operation of extra safety facilities for tritium control.

Key words: fluoride-salt-cooled high-temperature reactor, tritium, transport characteristic, transient

秦浩;王成龙*;秋穗正;田文喜;苏光辉. 氟盐冷却高温堆氚输运特性瞬态分析[J]. 原子能科学技术, 2018, 52(5): 795-801.

QIN Hao;WANG Chenglong*;QIU Suizheng;TIAN Wenxi;SU Guanghui. Tritium Transport Characteristics Analysis for Fluoridesalt-cooled High-temperature Reactor under Transient Condition[J]. Atomic Energy Science and Technology, 2018, 52(5): 795-801.

参考文献

［1］FORSBERG C, HU L, PETERSON P, et al. Fluoride-salt-cooled high-temperature reactor (FHR) for power and process heat［R］. USA: MIT, 2014.
［2］SERP J, ALLIBERT M, BENEŠ O, et al. The molten salt reactor (MSR) in Generation Ⅳ: Overview and perspectives［J］. Progress in Nuclear Energy, 2014, 77: 308-319.
［3］江绵恒，徐洪杰，戴志敏. 未来先进核裂变能——TMSR核能系统［J］. 中国科学院院刊，2012，27(3)：366-374.JIANG Mianheng, XU Hongjie, DAI Zhimin. Advanced fission energy program—TMSR nuclear energy system［J］. Bulletin of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 2012, 27(3): 366-374(in Chinese).
［4］黄豫，刘卫，肖德涛，等. 熔盐堆中氚的控制和监测［J］. 核技术，2011，34(8)：632-636.HUANG Yu, LIU Wei, XIAO Detao, et al. Control and monitoring of tritium in molten salt reactor［J］. Nuclear Techniques, 2011, 34(8): 632-636(in Chinese).
［5］HOLCOMB D E, FLANAGAN G F, MAYS G T, et al. Fluoride salt-cooled high-temperature reactor technology development and demonstration roadmap［R］. USA: ORNL, 2013.
［6］FORSBERG C W, LAM S, CARPENTER D M, et al. Tritium control and capture in salt-cooled fission and fusion reactors: Status, challenges, and path forward［C］∥Integrated Research Project Workshop Fluoride-salt-cooled High-temperature Reactor (FHR) Workshop. USA: MIT, 2016.
［7］STEMPIEN J D, BALLINGER R G, FORSBERG C W. An integrated model of tritium transport and corrosion in fluoride salt-cooled high-temperature reactors (FHRs), Part Ⅰ: Theory and benchmarking［J］. Nuclear Engineering and Design, 2016, 310: 258-272.
［8］秦浩，王成龙，张大林，等. 氟盐冷却高温堆氚输运特性数值研究［J］. 原子能科学技术，2018,52(3):434-440.QIN Hao, WANG Chenglong, ZHANG Dalin, et al. Numerical analysis of tritium transport characteristics in fluoride-salt-cooled high-temperature reactor［J］. Atomic Energy Science and Technology, 2018, 52(3): 434-440(in Chinese).
［9］FORSBERG C W. Fluoride-salt-cooled high temperature reactors (FHRs) for base-load and peak electricity, grid stabilization, and process heat［R］. USA: MIT, 2013.
［10］王成龙. 移动式氟盐高温堆物理热工安全特性研究［D］. 西安：西安交通大学能源与动力工程学院，2016.
［11］肖瑶. 氟盐冷却高温堆热工水力特性及安全审评关键问题研究［D］. 西安：西安交通大学，2014.
［12］SINAP. Pre-conceptual design of a 2 MW pebble-bed fluoride salts coolant high temperature test reactor (2 MW PB-FHR)［R］. Shanghai: Shanghai Institute of Applied Physics, 2012.
［13］苏光辉，秋穗正，田文喜. 核动力系统热工水力计算方法［M］. 北京：清华大学出版社，2013.

[1]	张宝锐, 夏兆阳, 周志伟. 硅酸锂球床传热传质特性与吹扫气体流动的DEM-CFD耦合模拟[J]. 原子能科学技术, 2021, 55(8): 1367-1375.
[2]	冀锐敏;严睿;康旭忠;杨璞;于世和;邹杨. 随机球床模拟方法对氟盐冷却高温堆中子学参数的影响分析[J]. 原子能科学技术, 2021, 55(4): 704-711.
[3]	乔守旭;钟文义;谭思超;张彪;王爽. 竖直下降两相流相界面结构输运特性[J]. 原子能科学技术, 2021, 55(2): 229-236.
[4]	韩一丹;张生栋;鄢枭;高志刚;张振涛. 放射性废物处理与整备关键技术研究进展[J]. 原子能科学技术, 2020, 54(zengkan): 137-142.
[5]	骆贝贝;王玉林;葛艳艳;占勤;杨洪广. 堆内辐照氚增殖剂球床有效热导率分析[J]. 原子能科学技术, 2020, 54(3): 443-449.
[6]	占勤;杨洪广;袁晓明. 阻氚用Fe-Al渗铝层表面稳态相Al₂O₃膜生长机理研究[J]. 原子能科学技术, 2020, 54(12): 2330-2336.
[7]	张哲;张伟光;安竹;孙洪伟;胡双林. 加速器氚靶膜厚误差对BIXS方法反演的影响[J]. 原子能科学技术, 2020, 54(10): 1956-1960.
[8]	陆光达;向鑫;张桂凯;范东军;包锦春;陈长安;唐涛. 氚在RAFM钢表面的吸附研究[J]. 原子能科学技术, 2019, 53(8): 1367-1375.
[9]	张洁;阮见;何龙;李明海;戴叶;蔡翔舟. 1 GWt PB-FHR负荷跟踪运行特性分析[J]. 原子能科学技术, 2019, 53(6): 1055-1062.
[10]	蒲国;刘波*;林黎蔚. α/γ相比率调控对超音速等离子喷涂Al₂O₃阻氚涂层微结构及性能的影响[J]. 原子能科学技术, 2019, 53(3): 465-470.
[11]	阮见;邹杨;KENDRICK J;李明海;PETERSON P F;徐洪杰. 氟盐冷却高温堆半实物仿真及初步测试[J]. 原子能科学技术, 2018, 52(4): 659-665.
[12]	周波;严睿;邹杨;戴叶;朱贵凤;于世和;刘亚芬;杨璞;冀锐敏;康旭忠. 氟盐冷却高温堆主冷却剂系统¹⁶N源项分析[J]. 原子能科学技术, 2018, 52(4): 652-658.
[13]	秦浩;王成龙*;张大林;田文喜;秋穗正;苏光辉. 氟盐冷却高温堆氚输运特性数值研究[J]. 原子能科学技术, 2018, 52(3): 434-440.
[14]	郭庆洋;张竞宇;孙业帅;方晟;陈义学. 压水堆主冷却剂中氚源项计算分析[J]. 原子能科学技术, 2018, 52(12): 2113-2117.
[15]	高晖;孙亮;袁永刚. 亚细胞尺度氚非均匀分布下单粒子效应的蒙特卡罗模拟计算[J]. 原子能科学技术, 2018, 52(11): 2106-2112.