高温熔融物与金属堆腔相互作用实验研究

doi:10.7538/yzk.2019.youxian.0298

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

为掌握船用反应堆严重事故工况下压力容器失效初期堆芯熔融物热冲击对金属堆腔的破坏效应，开展了堆芯熔融物与金属堆腔相互作用机理实验。根据相似准则设计缩比金属堆腔实验装置，利用已有高温熔融物实验平台制备2 700 ℃高温氧化锆熔融物，通过特制卸料机构将高温熔融物卸料到实验段，对热冲击下实验段温度和变形响应特性及主要影响因素进行了研究。实验结果表明，高温熔融物进入金属堆腔初期，热冲击导致的金属堆腔最高温度为601 ℃，最大塑性变形量为0.44 mm，高温熔融物未导致金属堆腔热失效及断裂失效，金属堆腔实验段能保持完整。由于船用反应堆金属堆腔材料、结构和外部冷却条件更有利于保持金属堆腔完整性，基于实验结果推断，严重事故下压力容器下封头失效初期热冲击导致金属堆腔失效的风险较低。

关键词: 熔融氧化锆, 金属堆腔, 热冲击失效, 严重事故

Abstract:

An experimental study was performed to understand the interaction mechanism and the thermal shock effect of the molten oxide and metallic cavity, when the reactor pressure vessel failure occurred in the core molten accident for the marine nuclear propulsion reactor. In this work, a scaled metallic cavity test section was designed on the basis of similarity criterion for the heat transfer progress, the zirconium oxide was melted at around 2 700 ℃ by using the cold crucible technique, and then the molten zirconium oxide was discharged into the metallic cavity. The temperature and deformation response characteristics and main influencing factors of the metallic cavity under thermal shock were obtained and studied. The experimental results show that the peak temperature of the metallic cavity caused by thermal shock is 601 ℃ and the maximum plastic deformation is 0.44 mm, neither thermal failure nor structural failure occurrs, and the integrity of the metallic cavity can be maintained in the early stage. The experimental results infer that the material, the structure and the coolant heat transfer conditions for the marine nuclear propulsion reactor are more conducive to maintaining the integrity of the metallic cavity, and the failure of the metallic cavity in the early stage is a very low probability event.

Key words: molten zirconium oxide, metallic cavity, thermal shock failure, severe accident

王登营;伊雄鹰;田道贵;裴杰;陈炼;商学利. 高温熔融物与金属堆腔相互作用实验研究[J]. 原子能科学技术, 2019, 53(11): 2189-2197.

WANG Dengying;YI Xiongying;TIAN Daogui;PEI Jie;CHEN Lian;SHANG Xueli. Experimental Study on Interaction between High Temperature Molten Oxide and Metallic Cavity[J]. Atomic Energy Science and Technology, 2019, 53(11): 2189-2197.

参考文献

［1］裴杰，陈炼，范昊龙. 压力容器内熔融物冷却技术研究试验台架［C］∥第十四届全国反应堆热工流体学术会议文集. 北京：中国核学会核能动力分会，2015.
［2］张亚培，张卢腾，田文喜，等. 基于二维切片结构的熔融池换热研究［C］∥第十四届全国反应堆热工流体学术会议文集. 北京：中国核学会核能动力分会，2015.
［3］ZHANG Y P, LU L T, ZHOU Y K, et al. The COPRA experiments on the in-vessel melt pool behavior in the RPV lower head［J］. Annals of Nuclear Energy, 2016, 89: 19-27.
［4］ZHANG Y P, LU L T, ZHOU Y K, et al. Natural convection heat transfer test for in-vessel retention at prototypic Rayleigh numbers: Resuts of COPRA experiments［J］. Progress in Nuclear Energy, 2016, 86: 80-86.
［5］刘文勇. 高温熔融物凝固机理的实验研究和数值模拟分析［D］. 上海：上海交通大学,2015.
［6］彭程，佟立丽，曹学武，等. 熔融物热细粒化的实验研究［J］. 核动力工程，2016，37(2)：171-174.PENG Cheng, TONG Lili, CAO Xuewu, et al. Experimental study on thermal fragmentation of melt［J］. Nuclear Power Engineering, 2016, 37(2): 171-174(in Chinese).
［7］SEHGAL B R, NOURGALIEV R R, DINH T N. Characterization of heat transfer processes in a melt pool convection and vessel-creep experiment［J］. Nuclear Engineering and Design, 2002, 211(2-3): 173-187.
［8］SEHGAL B R, GIRI A, CHIKKANAGOUDAR U, et al. Experiments on in-vessel melt coolability in the EC-FOREVER program［J］. Nuclear Engineering and Design, 2006, 236: 2199-2210.
［9］KOUNDY V, FICHOT F, WILLSCHUETZ H G, et al. Progress on PWR lower head failure predictive models［J］. Nuclear Engineering and Design, 2008, 238: 2420-2429.
［10］NICOLAS L, DURIN M, KOUNDY V, et al. Results of benchmark calculations based on OLHF-1 test［J］. Nuclear Engineering and Design, 2003, 223(3): 263-277.
［11］吕学星，李锋，曹旭东，等. 普碳钢Q235的应力-应变曲线研究［J］. 山东冶金，2007，29(1)：41-42.LV Xuexing, LI Feng, CAO Xudong, et al. Research on the stress-strain curve of plain carbon steel Q235［J］. Shandong Metallurgy, 2007, 29(1): 41-42(in Chinese).

[1]	孙晓晖, 孙婧, 王辉, 陈巧艳, 李精精, 龚培礼. 事故工况下核电厂安全壳内放射性气溶胶电荷分布研究[J]. 原子能科学技术, 2022, 56(zengkan1): 67-73.
[2]	高鹏程, 张斌, 单建强. 燃料棒破损热力学模块开发及在严重事故分析程序中的应用[J]. 原子能科学技术, 2022, 56(7): 1300-1307.
[3]	吴志远, 张魁, 冯唐涛, 陈荣华, 田文喜, 秋穗正, 苏光辉. 基于替代材料的燃料棒熔化实验研究[J]. 原子能科学技术, 2022, 56(6): 1120-1128.
[4]	柴国旱, 杨志义, 肖军, 王岳巍, 丁超, 种毅敏. 福岛核事故后核安全改进行动及安全要求研究[J]. 原子能科学技术, 2022, 56(3): 399-409.
[5]	马钎朝;周艳民;李应治;谷海峰;孙中宁;李伊辰. 上升气泡内气溶胶沉降机理研究[J]. 原子能科学技术, 2021, 55(3): 440-446.
[6]	芦苇, 史国宝, 王佳赟, 曹克美, 张琨. 增强IVR有效性的堆内注水策略研究[J]. 原子能科学技术, 2021, 55(11): 2013-2020.
[7]	袁璐, 曹学武. 核电厂严重事故下氢气源项的不确定性分析[J]. 原子能科学技术, 2021, 55(11): 2036-2042.
[8]	周艳民;孙中宁;谷海峰;李应治;马钎朝. 池式鼓泡条件下气溶胶沉降效率研究[J]. 原子能科学技术, 2020, 54(9): 1612-1616.
[9]	孙雪霆;季松涛;陈林林;史晓磊;魏严凇. 严重事故下气溶胶再悬浮的ECART模型分析[J]. 原子能科学技术, 2020, 54(9): 1673-1678.
[10]	丁超;杨志义;周志伟;宋明强;柴国旱;仇苏辰;种毅敏. 先进压水堆核电厂氢气控制策略分析研究[J]. 原子能科学技术, 2020, 54(7): 1221-1227.
[11]	崔成鑫;黄挺;陈炼;张蕾. 动态可靠性评价方法在AP1000核电厂严重事故中的应用研究[J]. 原子能科学技术, 2020, 54(7): 1235-1240.
[12]	丁超;周志伟;宋明强;夏兆阳;姜韶堃;杨志义. 反应堆非能动氢气复合器严重事故下消氢性能研究[J]. 原子能科学技术, 2020, 54(4): 629-634.
[13]	田道贵;胡啸;陈炼;常华健. 池沸腾下朝向SA508钢表面临界热流密度特性试验研究[J]. 原子能科学技术, 2020, 54(12): 2362-2368.
[14]	张越;贠相羽;陆雨洲;张会勇;单建强;孙吉良. 基于耦合CFD-FEM方法的严重事故下RPV蠕变失效风险评估[J]. 原子能科学技术, 2020, 54(12): 2431-2438.
[15]	丁硕;黄海富;钟汝浩;张小英;展德奎. 压水堆堆芯熔融物的运动及传热数值分析[J]. 原子能科学技术, 2020, 54(1): 44-52.