基于格林函数方法的核部件疲劳分析方法研究

doi:10.7538/yzk.2020.youxian.0379

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

格林函数法是一种快速求解热应力的方法。本文阐述了格林函数法的理论，并采用快速傅里叶变换（FFT）的方法加速其中关键积分的计算速度；还对疲劳分析后续流程进行了讨论，包括应力线性化、应力极值点选取、雨流计数法应力配对和环境疲劳修正因子计算。结合核电站典型部件模型对开发的程序和算法与ANSYS结果进行了对比验证，对比结果很好地证明了算法和程序的正确性。

关键词: 格林函数法, 热应力, 快速傅里叶变换, 雨流计数法, 疲劳, 环境疲劳修正因子

Abstract:

The Green’s function method is a fast solution method of thermal stress. In this paper, the theory of Green’s function method was stated and the fast Fourier transform (FFT) was used to accelerate the calculation of key integral. The process of fatigue analysis was also discussed, including stress linearization, stress extreme points selection, stresses states pairing by the Rain flow counting method and the calculation of environmental fatigue correction factor. A test case with typical component of the nuclear power plant was conducted to validate the algorithms and programs, comparing with ANSYS solution. The validity of program and algorithm is well proved by the comparison result.

Key words: Green’s function method, thermal stress, fast Fourier transform, Rain flow counting method, fatigue, environmental fatigue correction factor

谢海;邵雪娇;张毅雄;卢喜丰;艾红雷;白晓明;高世卿. 基于格林函数方法的核部件疲劳分析方法研究[J]. 原子能科学技术, 2021, 55(2): 305-314.

XIE Hai;SHAO Xuejiao;ZHANG Yixiong;LU Xifeng;AI Honglei;BAI Xiaoming;GAO Shiqing. Study on Fatigue Analysis Method of Nuclear Component Based on Green’s Function Method[J]. Atomic Energy Science and Technology, 2021, 55(2): 305-314.

参考文献

［1］Report on assessment of environmentally-assisted fatigue for LWR extended service condition, ANL-LWRS-47［R］. US: Argonne National Laboratory, 2011.
［2］Regulatory guide 1.207Guidelines for evaluating fatigue analysis incorporating the life reduction of metal components due to the effects of light-water reactor environment for new reactors［S］. US: US Nuclear Regulatory Commission, 2007.
［3］CHOPRA O K, SHACK W J. Effect of LWR coolant environments on the fatigue life of reactor materials, NUREG/CR-6909 ANL-06/08［R］. US: US Nuclear Regulatory Commission, 2007.
［4］CHOPRA O, STEVENS G L. Effect of LWR coolant environments on the fatigue life of reactor materials: NUREG/CR6909 ANL-12/60［R］. US: US Nuclear Regulatory Commission, 2018.
［5］STEVENS G L, GERBER D A, ROSINSKI S T. Latest advances in fatigue monitoring technology using EPRI’s fatigue Pro software［R］. US: EPRI, 1999.
［6］Stress-based fatigue monitoring methodology for fatigue monitoring of class 1 nuclear components in a reactor water environment, Technical report No. 1022876［R］. Palo Alto, CA: EPRI, 2011.
［7］章贵和，段远刚，徐晓，等. 格林函数法在快速计算热应力中的应用研究［J］. 核动力工程，2013，34（5）：45-47.ZHANG Guihe, DUAN Yuangang, XU Xiao, et al. Study on application of Green’s function method in thermal stress rapid calculation［J］. Nuclear Power Engineering, 2013, 34(5): 45-47(in Chinese).
［8］ASME boiler and pressure vessel code: 2007+2009 addenda edition, Section Ⅲ: Rules for construction of nuclear power plant components［S］. US: The American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 2009.
［9］ANSYS boiler and pressure vessel code: User’s manual, rules for construction of nuclear facility components, 2015 edition［S］. USA: The American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 2015.
［10］ISO 12110-2Metallic materials-fatigue testing-variable amplitude fatigue testing, Part 2: Cycle counting and related data reduction methods［S］. US: ISO, 2013.
［11］Guidelines for addressing environmental effects in fatigue usage calculations, Technical report No. 1025823［R］. Palo Alto, CA: EPRI, 2011.
［12］Design and construction rules for mechanical components of PWR nuclear islands: 2007 edition［S］. France: FRAMATOME, AFCEN, 2007.
［13］ZHANG Hengliang, LIU Shi, XIE Danmei, et al. Online fatigue-monitoring models with consideration of temperature dependent properties and varying heat transfer coefficients［J］. Science and Technology of Nuclear Installations, 2013. Article ID 763175.
［14］ROUSE J, HYDE C. A comparison of simple methods to incorporate material temperature dependency in the Green’s function method for estimating transient thermal stresses in thick-walled power plant components［J］. Materials, 2016. doi: 10.3390/ma9010026.
［15］KO H K, JHUNG M J, CHOI J B. Development of Green’s function approach considering temperature-dependent material properties and its application［J］. Nuclear Engineering and Technology, 2014, 46(1): 101-108.

[1]	庾明达, 张丽屏, 傅孝龙, 杜娟, 邵雪娇, 姜露. 反应堆结构类裂纹不连续区的疲劳损伤评价方法研究[J]. 原子能科学技术, 2022, 56(12): 2707-2716.
[2]	魏连峰;崔光顺;包陈;郑勇;王世忠. 温度及氢化物对Zr-Sn-Nb合金焊缝疲劳裂纹扩展行为的影响研究[J]. 原子能科学技术, 2021, 55(3): 527-533.
[3]	邵雪娇;谢海;熊夫睿;张毅雄;杜娟;艾红雷;刘正谷. 压水堆材料冷却剂环境疲劳修正因子研究[J]. 原子能科学技术, 2020, 54(6): 1085-1091.
[4]	钟巍华;佟振峰;王成龙;鱼滨涛;刘健;郑全;杨文. 国产A508-3钢在模拟AP1000一回路水环境下的疲劳性能研究[J]. 原子能科学技术, 2020, 54(4): 702-708.
[5]	杨鹏. 高速旋转机械用消除频率混叠现象的小波变换算法研究[J]. 原子能科学技术, 2019, 53(3): 557-562.
[6]	钟巍华;佟振峰;宁广胜;周子扬;鱼滨涛;杨文. 辐照用小尺寸样品力学性能表征技术研究进展[J]. 原子能科学技术, 2019, 53(10): 1894-1906.
[7]	赵杰江;唐力晨;钱浩;谢永诚;丁淑蓉;霍永忠. 侧压对传热管用690合金微动疲劳寿命影响的计算分析与估算公式[J]. 原子能科学技术, 2018, 52(6): 1070-1076.
[8]	郑澍;陆道纲;曹琼;刘超;丁云龙. 快堆中心测量柱高周热疲劳评定方法[J]. 原子能科学技术, 2018, 52(5): 942-947.
[9]	雷柏茂;李骞;黄创绵;王春辉. 多轴疲劳模型对比研究及其在核电结构热疲劳寿命预测中的应用[J]. 原子能科学技术, 2018, 52(4): 677-684.
[10]	罗亚林;刘新;陈蓉;陈先龙;何大宇. 核电厂金属疲劳监测过程中环境影响疲劳评价方法研究[J]. 原子能科学技术, 2018, 52(4): 685-690.
[11]	黄毅;王明政;颜寒;高付海. 快堆中心柱低周疲劳可靠性评价[J]. 原子能科学技术, 2018, 52(1): 118-125.
[12]	刘浪;凌君;曹雷生;何大宇. 单位瞬态法在核电厂疲劳监测系统中的应用[J]. 原子能科学技术, 2017, 51(6): 1051-1058.
[13]	王东辉;张丽屏;傅孝龙. 核设备弹塑性疲劳分析方法研究[J]. 原子能科学技术, 2017, 51(11): 2036-2041.
[14]	钟巍华;佟振峰;王成龙;王正;李金许;杨文. 国产316LN不锈钢在模拟AP1000一回路水环境中的疲劳行为[J]. 原子能科学技术, 2017, 51(10): 1846-1852.
[15]	王凯;王文博;刘厚林;丁荣;郭豹. 安全壳喷淋泵转子系统热冲击特性分析[J]. 原子能科学技术, 2016, 50(7): 1208-1215.